|
Click on the cover to read the latest issue of PSB
Affiliate Links
|
The digital recession14 April 2009 Businesses are concerned that counterfeiting will increase as a result of the recession, and want to see much stronger controls put in place to protect them from internet abuses, according to new research by Marks & Clerk, the leading intellectual property firm. In a survey of over 200 businesses, 97 per cent believe that counterfeiting will increase in the recession, while 80 per cent believe businesses will be at ‘much greater risk’ than in previous downturns due to the phenomenal growth of the Internet.
75 per cent of respondents argue that stronger action is now required to protect companies from counterfeiters, and a clear majority of 61 per cent argue that the solution lies in the creation of a more powerful cybercrime authority, with stiffer penalties being imposed directly on infringers. 55 per cent go so far as to suggest that stronger penalties should also be levied against the online marketplaces themselves, such as eBay, in enabling counterfeiting to prosper. Over three quarters (76 per cent) feel that the law has failed to keep up with the challenges posed by the rise of the internet, in protecting business’ intellectual property.
Pam Withers, partner at Marks & Clerk, comments, “This is the first recession in the digital era and businesses are anxious about the consequences. The success of the internet has meant that we are seeing increasingly vociferous criticism of those who play a part in counterfeiting - even those who do so unwittingly. Even before the slowdown, strong brands such as Tiffany’s & Co and L’Oreal were critical of the role the internet plays in enabling the sale of counterfeit goods, which is intensifying as the recession takes hold.
“One of the major headaches has been the lack of certainty for businesses due to the fragmented treatment of these issues from one country to another. The internet is an international channel requiring a more co-ordinated response, which may account for the frustration expressed in our survey about intellectual property systems. Our survey proposes a more powerful cybercrime authority, which could well allay the fears of brand owners and satisfy popular online marketplaces, establishing a clearer framework to punish the real offenders. This would likely involve a crime force ready to take action once brand owners have identified counterfeit goods being offered online - although this would require brand owners to become much more active in identifying fakes in the first place.”
The survey finds that businesses’ concerns extend more broadly to the role that search engines play in enabling access to counterfeit goods, with 59 per cent believing that a protocol needs to be created to engage search engines in the fight against counterfeiters. This is notable in view of the long-running dispute between Google and Louis Vuitton’s owner, LVMH. The latter objects to the service provider selling keywords to the highest bidder, including rivals or potentially counterfeiters.
Withers continues, “Search engines have not been immune from censure as a result of their increasing dominance and the effectiveness of their advertising strategies. The market needs a clear line to be drawn by the courts to establish where the ground lies, and if the onus should be solely on the consumer, or if the internet has now got too big for this to remain the case. But both sides will need to play ball. Businesses need to take firmer action to protect their brands, while service providers need to recognise their responsibilities and engage with the problem so they are not a vehicle for infringement”.
Amongst other findings is the fact that businesses are also concerned about the threat of legitimate competition on the web, particularly when it relates to misinformation from competitors. 58 per cent object to the practice of competitors paying for sponsored keywords in their name, and argue that this too should constitute trade mark infringement.
Yet tellingly, the survey suggests that businesses are reluctant to take on the mantle of protecting their brands in the online marketplace themselves. Only 25 per cent think that the burden should fall on businesses to police their brand more effectively, although 39 per cent recognise that they could nonetheless allocate more of their own resources to the problem.
Kirsten Gilbert, associate at Marks & Clerk Solicitors, adds, “While the internet poses many challenges to brand owners as a powerful distribution channel which can be abused, the tactical moves of competitors should be separated from the more damaging threat of counterfeiting. Businesses must also come to recognise that they will need to do more to protect themselves.
“Tying the hands of online marketplaces or service providers is dangerous, not least as so many small and medium businesses rely on the internet for distribution. Online channels also give companies the freedom to react more quickly to market needs and pricing sensitivity, which will prove yet more essential in this market. Retail data shows that online sales are holding up well in a recession that has hit our bricks-and-mortar high street hard. Any moves towards tighter regulation need to be balanced so changes remain cost-effective for all, and are matched by equal commitment from brand owners directly.” Contact Details and Archive...Most Viewed Articles... |
|